Home arrow Research arrow Pain >>> arrow Headaches in Children
Home    Contacts
Fayetteville Acupuncture & Chiropractic
Advertisement
Administrator
Web hosting
Advertisement

Headaches in Childern

Laser acupuncture effective against headaches in children

by Dave Gabriele, citizen journalist


(NaturalNews) The July 2008 issue of Pain, a prestigious peer-reviewed medical journal published by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), featured a German study conducted by eight pediatric doctors and clinicians. The researchers attempted to determine whether or not laser acupuncture would prove effective in relieving the symptoms of chronic headaches in 43 children.

The treatment for each child was individualized and completely based on the traditional Chinese medical theory. The theory contends that bioelectricity, or the electrical current that is produced by living organisms, has a tendency to follow paths of higher conductivity within the human body. These paths, called meridians, have been shown to be composed of points that have a higher electrical conductivity (lower electrical impedance) than other parts of the body. The ancient Chinese somehow discovered that stimulating these points, or "acupoints," produced changes in the body’s flow of current, and by doing so, influenced the health of an individual. Stimulation of these points include many different methods, the most well-known being acupuncture. Acupuncture is when very thin, electrical-conducting needles are inserted into these “acupoints” with the intention of manipulating the current.


Laser acupuncture, a relatively new method of stimulation, uses low-energy lasers to influence the flow of current at the acupoints. The German study, which is titled Laser acupuncture in children with headache: A double-blind, randomized, bicenter, placebo-controlled trial, specifically focuses on the effect of laser stimulation compared to placebo-stimulation.


The German Study


The study was carried out using the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled method so that the accuracy of the results would be as conclusive as the modern scientific method could allow. The German doctors wanted to know once and for all if active laser treatment is superior to placebo laser treatment; in other words, does it really work?


The conductors of the study took 43 children suffering from either chronic migraine headaches (22 patients) or chronic tension headaches (21 patients) and gave them four randomized treatments over four weeks. Each random treatment was double-blind, which means they were conducted so that both the researcher and the participant were unaware whether the laser had been set at the appropriate strength, or not set at all. Double-blind trials are believed to produce objective results, since the expectations of the researcher and the participant are believed to not affect the outcome.


The results of the study were analyzed in three ways. The first method examined and compared the number of headache days, or days that the children suffered from headaches. The researchers took the average number of headache days before the treatments and compared them with the average number of headache days after the treatment in both the placebo and the true treatment patients.


The second method compared the severity of the pain using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS is a medical tool that helps a person rate the intensity of certain sensations and feelings, such as pain. The VAS is obviously highly subjective; however, researchers commonly use this tool in order to examine changes in individuals over periods of time. In the scientific community, using the VAS to catalogue changes in perception over extended periods of time is seen as more reliable than using it at a single point of time.


The final method for analyzing the results was to compare the amount of time each child experienced headaches before and after the treatments. The changes in the amount of "headache time" were then examined for the true treatment cases and the placebo treatments.


The Results


The results were as follows: the mean number of headache days decreased by 1.0 day in the placebo group and 6.4 days in the treated group. The VAS, in contrast to the placebo group, showed a significant decrease in the children’s perception of the severity of the headaches. Finally, the children’s total amount of time with headaches was found to be much lower than the placebo group.


In other words, the children who received true laser acupuncture had less days where headaches occurred, felt less pain when headaches did occur and experienced much less time with headaches than the children who thought they were getting treatment but in fact were not.


The German researchers concluded, that laser acupuncture can provide a significant benefit for children with headache, with active laser treatment being clearly more effective than placebo laser treatment.

 
< Prev
Advertisement

 Anxiety and AcupunctureTreatments are relaxing and in general, you should experience almost immediate relief of any acute symptoms. Whether you are having panic attacks or experience general anxiety, over the course of regular treatment, symptoms will decrease in...
Quit Smoking with Acupuncture People who seek out acupuncture for smoking cessation are usually highly motivated to quit smoking. They may have attempted to quit previously without success, but now feel that they are ready. Their reasons for wanting to stop smoking are...
Pinched Nerve & Chiropractic The term “pinched nerve” is commonly used to describe the pain associated with a variety of conditions.Most of the time, what is called a pinched nerve is actually an irritated, or inflamed nerve where the nerve itself is not...
 Osteoarthritis & ChiropracticOsteoarthritis is a condition in which inflammation results in pain in the joints, caused by wearing of the cartilage that covers and acts as a cushion inside joints. As the bone surfaces become less well protected by cartilage, a...


Acupuncture Research
Polpular
Newsflash
Breast Cancer

Acupuncture Offers Benefits in Alleviating Breast Cancer Treatment Side-Effects

by: Dave Gabriele, citizen journalist


(NaturalNews) A 2008 American study, which appeared in the September issue of The International Journal of Radiation Oncology, examined the effectiveness of acupuncture in treating women coping with the side effects of conventional breast cancer medicine. Eleanor Walker, M.D., a radiation oncologist at the Henry Ford Hospital Department of Radiation Oncology in Detroit, led a team of researchers to compare acupuncture treatment with the common anti-estrogen treatment used to control breast cancer therapy side effects. The side effects, such as hot flashes and depression, affect about 80% of women treated for breast cancer and are usually treated by the pharmaceutical anti-depressant venlafaxine (Effexor). Many breast cancer patients refuse venlafaxine because of its own set of negative side effects.

Read more...
 
Endometriosis Research

Endometriosis

A combination of Chinese herbal medicine and laparoscopy is the most effective way to treat endometrial ovarian cysts and increase reproductive function.


A study was carried out in Beijing to compare 3 different treatment methods for endometriosis. A group of 152 women with endometrial cysts, were divided into 3 groups: a combined Chinese herbal medicine and laparoscopy group (combination group), a Chinese herbal medicine only group, and a Danazol group. The clinical effectiveness, side effects and reproductive hormones were then compared. The shrinkage and disappearance rate of the cysts, as well as the pregnancy rate were highest in the combination group, and there were few side effects noted. The study concluded that way to treat endometrial ovarian cysts, increasing reproductive function a combination of laparoscopy and Chinese herbal medicine is an effective and causing very few side effects.


Wu Y Hua L (Clinical study on endometrial ovarian cysts treated by integrated laparoscopy and Chinese herbal medicine) Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi, 2000 March, 20 (3): 183-6.

Read more...